nanog mailing list archives
[nanog] Re: Quagga for production?
From: Chriztoffer Hansen <chriztoffer () netravnen de>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 19:34:53 +0100
Raymond Burkholder wrote:
On 2020-02-23 5:26 a.m., Dmitry Sherman wrote:Anybody working with Quagga for production peering with multiple peers and dynamic eBGP/iBGP announcement?Free Range Routing (FRR) forked Quagga a few years back. I would say it is the new Quagga. But either flavour handles multiple peers and full routing tables / DFZ with aplomb. VYOS was Quagga, but now incorporates FRR, and is a good routing workhorse.
PfSense, too. https://blog.vyos.io https://cumulusnetworks.com/blog/free-range-routing-anniversary/ https://www.cloudscale.ch/en/news/2017/11/27/new-border-routers-with-frr https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/04/quagga_open_source_routing_resuscitated_as_free_range_routing/ https://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/US19/presentation_6721_1554447941.pdf https://www.zdnet.com/article/internet-experiment-goes-wrong-takes-down-a-bunch-of-linux-routers/ <= Used by players as the bgp speaker on edge network nodes. Article is of the 'famous' experiment from last year. Were use of an experimental BGP code. Caused FRR bgp speakers to crash. The code error was since be corrected as an emergency hot-fix. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18552425 -- Best regards, Chriztoffer
Current thread:
- Quagga for production? Dmitry Sherman (Feb 23)
- Re: Quagga for production? Nathan Brookfield (Feb 23)
- Re: Quagga for production? Nathan Brookfield (Feb 23)
- Re: Quagga for production? Raymond Burkholder (Feb 23)
- [nanog] Re: Quagga for production? Chriztoffer Hansen (Feb 23)