nanog mailing list archives
Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential
From: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian () interlinx bc ca>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:01:20 -0500
On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 13:54 -0600, Blake Hudson wrote:
Isn't this exactly why Net Neutrality is a thing:
Isn't it a "dead" thing in the USofA?
So that people (or companies) are free to develop new applications or enhance existing ones without running into a quagmire of different policies implemented by any number of different networks between the application developer and the application's users?
Yes, this is a very prominent reason for Net Neutrality. Too bad the FCC killed that out from under the people and companies that would utilize it to develop new applications. Cheers, b.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential, (continued)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Daniel Sterling (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Jared Mauch (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Lukas Tribus (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Masataka Ohta (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Tom Beecher (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Blake Hudson (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Jared Mauch (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Blake Hudson (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Jared Mauch (Feb 20)
- Re: [External] Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Hunter Fuller (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Brian J. Murrell (Feb 19)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Mike Hammett (Feb 19)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Blake Hudson (Feb 19)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Brandon Martin (Feb 19)