nanog mailing list archives
Re: CISCO 0-day exploits
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 10:13:45 -0800
--- nanog () nanog org wrote: From: "Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
https://www.armis.com/cdpwn/ What's the impact on your network? Everything is under control?
--------------------------------------- I really thought that more Cisco devices were deployed among NANOG. I guess that these devices are not used anymore or maybe that I understood wrong the severity of this CVE. --------------------------------------- Just because you use cisco devices doesn't mean you have to use their proprietary protocols, such as EIGRP or CDP. OSPF or LLDP work just fine and interoperate with other vendors... :) scott
Current thread:
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits, (continued)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Saku Ytti (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Tom Hill (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Ahmed Borno (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Saku Ytti (Feb 11)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Harlan Stenn (Feb 11)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Ahmed Borno (Feb 11)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Saku Ytti (Feb 11)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Ahmed Borno (Feb 11)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits sronan (Feb 11)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Saku Ytti (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Justin Wilson (Feb 10)
- Re: CISCO 0-day exploits Tom Hill (Feb 10)