nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10g residential CPE
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 11:51:28 +0200
On 12/29/20 21:44, James R Cutler wrote:
Supplying any configurable residential CPE would not necessarily be cheaper. The tracking and accounting for the hardware and qualifying said hardware, not to mention truck rolls for hardware updates, could well be more costly than fielding support calls (which would likely not decrease anyway).
Probably why the free plan doesn't include a router :-). Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: 10g residential CPE, (continued)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Ben Cannon (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Aaron Wendel (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mike Hammett (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Aaron Wendel (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE James R Cutler (Dec 29)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Aaron Wendel (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Allen McKinley Kitchen (gmail) (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Aaron Wendel (Dec 28)
- Message not available
- Re: 10g residential CPE Aaron Wendel (Dec 28)