Re: Ipv6 help

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

Another thing worth of consideration is that virtually any box with an OpenWRT image can support CLAT if it has enough 
resources.

Owen


> On Aug 24, 2020, at 8:21 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
>
> You probably mean 464XLAT ....
>
> Ask you vendors. They should support it. Ask for RFC8585 support, even better.
>
> If they don't do, is because they are interested only in selling new boxes ... just something to think in the future 
> about those vendors.
>
> I can tell you that many vendors now support or are waiting for some customers to ask for it, the CLAT. I've been 
> doing this for many customers. Sometimes, they only do under request, same as many other firmware features.
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
> @jordipalet
>
>
>
> El 24/8/20 16:32, "NANOG en nombre de Roman Tatarnikov" <nanog-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel.es () nanog org en 
> nombre de r.tatarnikov () intlos org> escribió:
>
>    I've been looking into implementing 646XLAT, however I found the problem ends up with clients' routers.
>
>    When you give them Ethernet cable that has internet on it, whatever it gets plugged into must support CLAT in 
> order for 646XLAT to work. I was not able to find any small devices that support it natively, at least according to 
> their description. The only way I found to enable CLAT support is to flash those devices with OpenWRT, which is not 
> really an option when you are giving away those tiny boxes to residential clients when they sign up with you.
>
>    So for now we're stuck with CGNAT. :( I do hope I'm wrong and you can tell me which device works with 646XLAT out 
> of the box. And hopefully it's something TRENDnet's.
>
>    -- 
>    Roman V Tatarnikov
>    https://linkedin.com/in/rtatarnikov
>    W: 310 929 2607 | C: 805 746 2886
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to 
> be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, 
> distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any 
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached 
> files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to 
> inform about this communication and delete it.