nanog mailing list archives
Re: 100g PCS Errors
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:19:05 +0200
On 20/Aug/20 08:16, Saku Ytti wrote:
On QSFP28 devices I would recommend always when possible run RS-FEC. By default LR4 doesn't run it, but the added value is fantastic. You will immediately during turn-up know if circuit works or not, without any ping testing or live traffic. You will know if the circuit doesn't work, before it impacts customers. Combine preFEC with DDM and you have fantastic predictive power over failures and you can reroute/schedule maintenance to fix issues before they become symptomatic.
Yes, thanks. I recall you recommended this to someone earlier in the year, so we have it in our library for deployment when we do the turn-up. All our 100Gbps deployments are currently within the data centre, so SR4 optics; which Juniper enables RS-FEC on by default. But yes, we shall definitely do the same (manually) for LR4. IOS XR appears to suggest that FEC configuration is not explicitly needed, unless the optic is a non-Cisco qualified non-LR4 unit. Mark.
Current thread:
- 100g PCS Errors Nicholas Warren (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Matt Harris (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Tom Beecher (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Aaron (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Clinton Work (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Mark Tinka (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Saku Ytti (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Mark Tinka (Aug 20)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Mark Tinka (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Aug 19)