nanog mailing list archives
Re: CGNAT Solutions
From: Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:29:57 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Robert Blayzor wrote:
One would think a 1000 ports would be enough, but if you have a dozen devices at home all browsing and doing various things, and with IOT, etc, maybe not?
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/nat-best-practices.htmlThere are some numbers in there for instance talking about 1024 ports per subscriber as a good number. In presentations I have seen over time, people typically talk about 512-4096 as being a good number for the bulk port allocation size.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: CGNAT Solutions, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: CGNAT Solutions William Herrin (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Brandon Martin (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Ca By (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Masataka Ohta (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Ca By (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Masataka Ohta (Apr 30)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Robert Blayzor (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Tarko Tikan (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions james jones (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Robert Blayzor (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Apr 29)
- RE: CGNAT Solutions Aaron Gould (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Jared Geiger (Apr 28)