nanog mailing list archives
"Is BGP safe yet?" test
From: Andrey Kostin <ankost () podolsk ru>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:08:14 -0400
Hi Nanog list, Would be interesting to hear your opinion on this: https://isbgpsafeyet.com/We have cases when residential customers ask support "why is your service isn't safe?" pointing to that article. It's difficult to answer correctly considering that the asking person usually doesn't know what BGP is and what it's used for, save for understanding it's function, design and possible misuses. IMO, on one hand it promotes and is aimed to push RPKI deployment, on the other hand is this a proper way for it? How ethical is to claim other market players unsafe, considering that scope of possible impact of not implementing it has completely different scale for a small stub network and big transit provider?
Kind regards, Andrey
Current thread:
- "Is BGP safe yet?" test Andrey Kostin (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Randy Bush (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Amir Herzberg (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Job Snijders (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Baldur Norddahl (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Saku Ytti (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Baldur Norddahl (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Andrey Kostin (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Randy Bush (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka (Apr 20)