nanog mailing list archives
Re: BIRD / BGP-ORR experiences?
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:55:19 +0200
On 16/Apr/20 16:50, Saku Ytti wrote:
That would be in IGP, so that'll work. The other way that some people do this, is that next-hop is CE, which is in iBGP, but recurses to loop0. There are some TE reasons why people might do this, and it would not work with Cisco ORR.
Reasonably safe to say that if you are doing TE, you are not always satisfied with what the IGP thinks, and want to override it to some extent :-). Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: BIRD / BGP-ORR experiences?, (continued)
- Re: BIRD / BGP-ORR experiences? Mark Tinka (Apr 15)
- Re: BIRD / BGP-ORR experiences? Tarko Tikan (Apr 15)
- Re: BIRD / BGP-ORR experiences? Mark Tinka (Apr 15)
- RE: BIRD / BGP-ORR experiences? Deepak Jain (Apr 15)
- RE: BIRD / BGP-ORR experiences? Deepak Jain (Apr 15)
- Re: BIRD / BGP-ORR experiences? Mark Tinka (Apr 16)
- Re: BIRD / BGP-ORR experiences? Saku Ytti (Apr 15)
- Re: BIRD / BGP-ORR experiences? Mark Tinka (Apr 16)
- Re: BIRD / BGP-ORR experiences? Saku Ytti (Apr 16)
- Re: BIRD / BGP-ORR experiences? Mark Tinka (Apr 16)