nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 00:07:28 -0400
Don't user as-sets step one. Rpki does not understand how to express an as-sets' authorization. Why do you want to do this? On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 13:34 Lars Prehn <lprehn () mpi-inf mpg de> wrote:
Hi everyone, how exactly do you aggregate routes? When do you add the AS_SET attribute, when do you omit it? How does the latter interplay with RPKI? Best regards, Lars
Current thread:
- Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Lars Prehn (Apr 13)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Christopher Morrow (Apr 13)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Lars Prehn (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Christopher Morrow (Apr 14)
- RE: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Deepak Jain (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Lars Prehn (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Alejandro Acosta (Apr 13)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Warren Kumari (Apr 14)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Matthew Petach (Apr 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Matthew Petach (Apr 15)
- RE: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Matthew Petach (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Christopher Morrow (Apr 13)