Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond

[Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com>]

And why are they not on any public peering exchange? Why only private?

> On Sep 16, 2019, at 19:35, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > On Sep 16, 2019, at 17:48 , Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. Sprint peering battle. Google it
> > > 2. He.net peering battle. Google it.
> > > 3. Google IPv6 peering battle. Google it.
> > >
> > > All of which point to them being pompous assholes.
> >
> > or point to them treating ipv6 the same as ipv4 when it comes to
> > peering, tech, ...  we are supposed to think ipv6 parity is a good
> > thing.
> >
> > randy
>
> Actually, their peering behavior in IPv4 is not quite as arrogant as it is in IPv6, so no, they aren’t doing parity.
>
> Owen