![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: California public safety power shutdowns
From: "Radu-Adrian Feurdean" <nanog () radu-adrian feurdean net>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:07:20 +0200
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, at 08:02, Mel Beckman wrote:
The fire risk is from electrical transmission lines, not from end users of electrical power. The underlying problem is that the State’s rules for line separation were ill-considered, making it possible for high-enough winds to cause “line slapping” and the resultant arcing that ignite fires. There is no reason to think that end users are of any particular risk, and fuel delivery during a preemptive outage wouldn’t be impaired,
That looks like a situation that you don't often encounter elsewhere (where electricity - distribution, telecom and transport are not very far from one another).
Current thread:
- California public safety power shutdowns Sean Donelan (Oct 09)
- Re: California public safety power shutdowns Fred Baker (Oct 09)
- Re: California public safety power shutdowns Sean Donelan (Oct 09)
- Re: California public safety power shutdowns Sean Donelan (Oct 09)
- Re: California public safety power shutdowns Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Oct 09)
- Re: California public safety power shutdowns Mel Beckman (Oct 09)
- Re: California public safety power shutdowns Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Oct 10)
- Re: California public safety power shutdowns Mel Beckman (Oct 10)
- Re: California public safety power shutdowns Sean Donelan (Oct 09)
- RE: California public safety power shutdowns Michel Py (Oct 09)
- Re: California public safety power shutdowns Sean Donelan (Oct 09)
- Re: California public safety power shutdowns Chuck Church (Oct 09)
- Re: California public safety power shutdowns Sean Donelan (Oct 09)
- Re: California public safety power shutdowns Michael Thomas (Oct 10)
- Re: California public safety power shutdowns Mel Beckman (Oct 10)