nanog mailing list archives
Re: Update to BCP-38?
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 06:56:51 +1000
Look at CableLabs specifications. There is also RFC 7084, Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers which CableLabs reference. Also RFC 8585, Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers to Support IPv4-as-a-Service Mark
On 5 Oct 2019, at 12:00 am, Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net> wrote: On 10/3/19 10:13 PM, Fred Baker wrote:There is one thing in 1122/1123 and 1812 that is not in those kinds of documents that I miss; that is essentially "why". Going through 1122/1123 and 1812, you'll ind several sections that say "we require X", and follow that with a "discussion" section that says "we thought about X, Y, and Z, there were proponents of each, the arguments were X', Y', and Z', and we chose X for this reason". I would presume that what you're really looking for in a 1812-for-IPv6 is not "we require X" as much as "for this reason". Correct me if I'm wrong.Ah. What I'm looking for is a list of check-boxes to include in an implementation specification for an edge router. It can be references to a whole bunch of RFCs and "packaged" as a BCP. The discussions you describe are better in the individual papers. Side note: I'm used to rationales being included in Standards, and welcome them, as long as they are normative and clearly marked so.I can kick the idea around in the IETF if its important to you. I'll be looking for a LOT of operational input.It could well me that the data is there, we just need a document to index it all. That's what I thought a BPC was supposed to be. It would be like an article in ACM Computing Surveys, which references the existing literature, as opposed to being created from whole cloth. I think I steered everyone wrong when I was talking about some of the exposition in the text, specifically the examples. That kind of material really belongs in an RFC. My apologies.
-- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: Update to BCP-38?, (continued)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Mark Andrews (Oct 02)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Marco Davids (Private) via NANOG (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Mark Andrews (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Fred Baker (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 04)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Mark Andrews (Oct 04)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Masataka Ohta (Oct 04)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Mark Andrews (Oct 02)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 05)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Fred Baker (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Fred Baker (Oct 03)
- RE: Update to BCP-38? Keith Medcalf (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? William Herrin (Oct 04)
- RE: Update to BCP-38? Keith Medcalf (Oct 04)