nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 12:34:10 +0900
Mark Andrews wrote:
Please explain how https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andrews-dnsop-update-parent-zones/ would not work. Update messages are designed to be forwarded and that includes signed UPDATE messages be they TSIG or SIG(0). Named already forwards UPDATE messages if your tell it to.
Forward to which IP address of the primary? Unupdated one?
We already have UPDATE clients that lookup SRV records to send UPDATE
With SRV? You introduce yet another server, address of which may also be updated!? Congratulations, you have made barely solvable problem unsolvable. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Mark Andrews (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment John Levine (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Mark Andrews (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Warren Kumari (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment tim () pelican org (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Harris (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Seth Mattinen (Oct 03)