nanog mailing list archives
Re: Update to BCP-38?
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:42:52 -0400
On Oct 3, 2019, at 9:51 AM, Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net> wrote: Someone else mentioned that "IPv6 has been around for 25 years, and why is it taking so long for everyone to adopt it?" I present as evidence the lack of a formally-released requirements RFC for IPv6. It suggests that the "science" of IPv6 is not "settled" yet. That puts the deployment of IPv6 in the category of "experiment" and not "production".
And, of course, we now have companies like T-Mobile and others turning IPv4 off. If that's an experiment, wow.
Current thread:
- Re: Update to BCP-38?, (continued)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Rich Kulawiec (Oct 08)
- RE: Update to BCP-38? Mark Collins (Oct 08)
- RE: Update to BCP-38? Keith Medcalf (Oct 08)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Mike Meredith via NANOG (Oct 09)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? William Herrin (Oct 08)
- RE: Update to BCP-38? Keith Medcalf (Oct 08)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 08)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Mark Collins (Oct 10)
- RE: Update to BCP-38? Keith Medcalf (Oct 08)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Rich Kulawiec (Oct 09)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Fred Baker (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Stephen Satchell (Oct 03)
- Re: Update to BCP-38? Fred Baker (Oct 03)