nanog mailing list archives
Re: virginia beach
From: Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 14:45:16 -0800
Seems logically similar to the reason why there are landing stations, but no noteworthy datacenters on the Oregon coast. Everything goes in various ring topology paths to Hillsboro/Portland. And routes that go more directly east to meet the fiber huts on long haul routes Portland-Sacramento. On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:51 PM Ethan O'Toole <telmnstr () 757 org> wrote:
hey there, we've put together a blog post about Virginia beach developments and howit can reshape some of the ways wehave been designing our networks. https://www.infrapedia.com/post/virginia-beach-a-new-hub-is-born MehmetEx-757'er (757 = Virginia Beach.) Dead area tech wise. Bad job prospects led the geeks to flee the area. Small lights out data centers to support a few undersea cables aren't going to change that. Those cables landing in VaBeach will have their traffic hauled to Northern Virginia -- where all the action is. It will do little to benefit the locals once the build out is done. - Ethan O'Toole
Current thread:
- virginia beach Mehmet Akcin (Nov 04)
- Re: virginia beach Ethan O'Toole (Nov 04)
- Re: virginia beach Mehmet Akcin (Nov 07)
- Re: virginia beach Ethan O'Toole (Nov 08)
- Re: virginia beach Eric Kuhnke (Nov 07)
- Re: virginia beach Mark Tinka (Nov 26)
- Re: virginia beach Ben Cannon (Nov 26)
- Re: virginia beach Mark Tinka (Nov 26)
- Re: virginia beach Mehmet Akcin (Nov 07)
- Re: virginia beach Ethan O'Toole (Nov 04)