nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIPE our of IPv4
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 16:40:11 -0800
--- cb.list6 () gmail com wrote: From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> If your business is dysfunctional, that is a different issue from ipv6 being dysfunctional. ----------------------------------------- I was just expressing the problems eyeball networks are having getting this done. Shittons of stuff is out there in the CPE that mobile and DC networks do not have to deal with. The suits are looking at the short term cost/risk. scott
Current thread:
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4, (continued)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Willy Manga (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Sabri Berisha (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Sabri Berisha (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Ca By (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Sabri Berisha (Nov 27)
- RE: RIPE our of IPv4 Michel Py (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Christian (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Ca By (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Christian (Nov 27)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mike Hammett (Nov 27)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 27)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 27)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Willy Manga (Nov 26)