nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIPE our of IPv4
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 05:41:22 +1100
But IPv4 is ripe. You have just become accustomed to the stench of NAT that you don’t realise it. -- Mark Andrews
On 26 Nov 2019, at 05:31, Jeff Shultz <jeffshultz () sctcweb com> wrote: Hard to say that something that is in full implementation and use is dead.On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 9:21 AM Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote: RIPE isn’t dead… Just IPv4. OwenOn Nov 25, 2019, at 08:03 , Ryland Kremeier <rkremeier () barryelectric com> wrote:RIP RIPE -----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> On Behalf Of Andy Ringsmuth Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 9:58 AM To: NANOG mailing list <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: RIPE our of IPv4On Nov 25, 2019, at 8:56 AM, Dmitry Sherman <dmitry () interhost net> wrote: Just received a mail that RIPE is out of IPv4: Dear colleagues, Today, at 15:35 UTC+1 on 25 November 2019, we made our final /22 IPv4 allocation from the last remaining addresses in our available pool. We have now run out of IPv4 addresses.Does this mean we are finally ripe for widespread IPv6 adoption? (Admit it, someone had to say it!) ---- Andy Ringsmuth 5609 Harding Drive Lincoln, NE 68521-5831 (402) 304-0083 andy () andyring com-- Jeff Shultz -- Like us on Social Media for News, Promotions, and other information!! <https://www.facebook.com/SCTCWEB/> <https://www.instagram.com/sctc_503/> <https://www.yelp.com/biz/sctc-stayton-3> <https://www.youtube.com/c/sctcvideos> _**** This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. ****_
Current thread:
- RE: RIPE our of IPv4 Ryland Kremeier (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Owen DeLong (Nov 25)
- RE: RIPE our of IPv4 Ryland Kremeier (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Jeff Shultz (Nov 25)
- RE: RIPE our of IPv4 Nicholas Warren (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Nov 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Willy Manga (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Sabri Berisha (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Sabri Berisha (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Ca By (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Sabri Berisha (Nov 27)
- RE: RIPE our of IPv4 Michel Py (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Christian (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Ca By (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Scott Weeks (Nov 26)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Owen DeLong (Nov 25)