nanog mailing list archives
Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE
From: "Mitcheltree, Harold B" <pete () ots utsystem edu>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 19:53:44 +0000
https://www.ekinops.com/products/flexrate-modules/aggregation-and-encryption-modules/pm-100g-agg --Pete PM 100G-AGG | Ekinops<https://www.ekinops.com/products/flexrate-modules/aggregation-and-encryption-modules/pm-100g-agg> www.ekinops.com 100G aggregation module The EKINOPS PM 100G-AGG is a multiprotocol aggregation module that allows network operators to deliver a wide range of connectivity and managed services. Designed as a companio... ________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of Brandon Martin <lists.nanog () monmotha net> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 1:24:05 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE On 5/28/19 11:12 AM, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
OTN is important for this project because we'd need many of its features in terms of FEC, monitoring and low jitter.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't "fractional" Ethernet services require packet switching with corresponding jitter anyway? It would be 1:1 switching which would keep the latency low, but you can't e.g. offer a 60Gbps bandwidth on 100GbE handoff and just put that straight on OTN. You'd have to either packet switch (and queue due to the incoming line rate being slower than the outgoing) it onto a FlexODU using GFP-F at 60Gbps (I'm not sure if anything even supports this) or just take the 100GbE staight onto OTN at 100Gbps. Now, you could obviously put two native 40GbE services onto a single OTU-4 (along with a couple 10Gbps or single 20Gbps packet service) without packet switching by just framing up both Ethernet services using your choice of GFP-F or GFP-T, and it could be done without queuing since the incoming and outgoing line rates are the same. The former would probably still end up being better than straight switched Ethernet, but it won't be the same as a straight re-framed Ethernet signal on OTN. FEC and enhanced monitoring are always nice, though. -- Brandon Martin
This message is from an external sender. Learn more about why this << matters at https://links.utexas.edu/rtyclf. <<
Current thread:
- Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Jérôme Nicolle (May 28)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Jason Lixfeld (May 28)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Jérôme Nicolle (May 28)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Brandon Martin (May 29)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Mitcheltree, Harold B (May 29)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Brandon Martin (May 29)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Jérôme Nicolle (May 30)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Brandon Martin (May 30)
- RE: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE adamv0025 (May 31)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Jérôme Nicolle (May 31)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Jérôme Nicolle (May 28)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Radu-Adrian Feurdean (May 31)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Jérôme Nicolle (May 31)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Jason Lixfeld (May 28)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Jérôme Nicolle (May 29)
- Re: Flexible OTN / fractional 100GbE Tom Hill (May 29)