nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamming of NANOG list members
From: "Scott Christopher" <sc () ottie org>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 18:40:36 +0300
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 08:17:31AM -0700, Brian Kantor wrote:Anne, the way that such addresses are often harvested is that one of the spammers (or his agent) becomes a member of the list and simply records the addresses of persons posting to the list. They then get spammed.I rather suspect that's exactly what's happening here. I've gotten three, but a colleague who is subscribed but has never posted has gotten zero, despite sharing the same email infrastructure and thus precisely the same configuration.
Not even that - google your email address inside " " and see where it can be harvested. -- S.C.
Current thread:
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members, (continued)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members William Herrin (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Mike Hammett (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Brian Kantor (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Rich Kulawiec (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members John Peach (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Bryan Holloway (May 31)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Niels Bakker (May 31)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Richard (May 31)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Paul Ferguson (May 31)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Grant Taylor via NANOG (May 31)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Scott Christopher (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Scott Christopher (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Rich Kulawiec (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Eric Tykwinski (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Grant Taylor via NANOG (May 24)
- Re: Spamming of NANOG list members Daniel Seagraves (May 24)