nanog mailing list archives
Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update!
From: Fernando Gont <fgont () si6networks com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 23:27:44 -0300
On 3/3/19 16:57, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2019-03-03 20:13, Mark Tinka wrote:On 3/Mar/19 18:05, Jeroen Massar wrote:IPv6 requires a minimum MTU of 1280. If you cannot transport it, then the transport (the tunnel in this case) needs to handle the fragmentation of packets of 1280 down to whatever does fit in the tunnel.As you know, IPv6 does not support fragmentation in transit. So that's not an option.The transport (tunnel) CAN support that kind of fragmentation.
Still, that's certainly not panacea. See: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7872 -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont () si6networks com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
Current thread:
- Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update!, (continued)
- Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update! Martin Hannigan (Mar 05)
- Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update! Fernando Gont (Mar 05)
- Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update! Mark Andrews (Mar 05)
- Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update! Fernando Gont (Mar 05)
- Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update! Mark Andrews (Mar 05)
- Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update! Fernando Gont (Mar 05)
- Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update! Mark Tinka (Mar 06)
- Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update! Mark Tinka (Mar 06)
- Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update! Jeroen Massar (Mar 04)
- Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update! Mark Tinka (Mar 03)
- Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update! Fernando Gont (Mar 05)