nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () massar ch>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 15:09:28 +0100
On 2019-03-08 14:45, Brandon Martin wrote:
On 3/8/19 8:38 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:Hey,now for UDP, I don't know yet how does things like QUIC can be handled ...Unfortunately the magic answer you were hoping does not exist, what they do is they just send smaller packets.What we almost seem to be moving toward in this discussion is an IP header where the path can reduce the reported MTU which can then be read at the receiving end. This would be somewhat like ECN just with more than a couple bits.
Something like what I once described in: https://jeroen.massar.ch/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6man-mtu-label-02.txt ? :) Greets, Jeroen
Current thread:
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms, (continued)
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms Saku Ytti (Mar 12)
- RE: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms adamv0025 (Mar 12)
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms Saku Ytti (Mar 12)
- RE: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms adamv0025 (Mar 13)
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms Masataka Ohta (Mar 09)
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms Jean-Daniel Pauget (Mar 08)
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms Saku Ytti (Mar 08)
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms Brandon Martin (Mar 08)
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms Jeroen Massar (Mar 08)
- Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms William Herrin (Mar 08)