nanog mailing list archives
Re: really amazon?
From: Landon Stewart <lstewart () inap com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:21:06 -0700
On Jul 31, 2019, at 1:13 PM, Scott Christopher <sc () ottie org> wrote:
Valdis Klētnieks wrote:On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:36:08 -0000, Richard Williams via NANOG said:To contact AWS SES about spam or abuse the correct email address is abuse () amazonaws comYou know that, and I know that, but why doesn't the person at AWS whose job it is to keep the ARIN info correct and up to date know that?Because it will get spammed if publicly listed in WHOIS.
Not an excuse. I’m saying this on behalf of ALL the other ASNs that keep their POCs up to date.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Current thread:
- Re: really amazon?, (continued)
- Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Richard Williams via NANOG (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Valdis Klētnieks (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Brian J. Murrell (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Stephen Satchell (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Richard Williams via NANOG (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Landon Stewart (Jul 31)
- Re: really amazon? Stephen Satchell (Jul 31)