![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: 44/8
From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 15:55:31 +0000
On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:50 AM, Matt Harris <matt () netfire net<mailto:matt () netfire net>> wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 10:41 AM John Curran <jcurran () arin net<mailto:jcurran () arin net>> wrote: On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:34 AM, Matt Harris <matt () netfire net<mailto:matt () netfire net>> wrote: Hey John, I understand that, however my understanding is that the establishment of an ARIN RSA is required prior to the transfer of a block or a portion or a block via ARIN (such as the transfer of 44.192/10). Thus, this would mean that the 44/8 block is now governed by an (well, more than one, now that it's split) ARIN RSA (or LRSA) whereas it was not before. Is that not correct? Matt - ARIN doesn’t discuss details of specific registrations publicly; you need to refer any such questions to the registrant. Without discussing any specific registration whatsoever, my understanding is that what I stated is the case as a matter of policy. Was just looking for confirmation that my reading of ARIN policy docs was not incorrect. :) Matt - Legacy resource holders may transfer a portion of their number resources without bringing the entire block under a registration services agreement. /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers
Current thread:
- Re: 44/8, (continued)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Harris (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Christopher Morrow (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 John Curran (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Harris (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 John Curran (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Harris (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 John Curran (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Owen DeLong (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 William Herrin (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 20)
- Re: 44/8 William Herrin (Jul 21)
- Re: 44/8 Aled Morris via NANOG (Jul 21)
- Re: 44/8 Sabri Berisha (Jul 21)
- Re: 44/8 Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Sabri Berisha (Jul 22)
- RE: 44/8 Naslund, Steve (Jul 23)
- Re: 44/8 Bryan Fields (Jul 21)