nanog mailing list archives
Re: QoS for Office365
From: Edward Salonia <ed () edgeoc net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:27:01 -0400
Have you looked into Cisco’s SD-AVC? Also with the o365 connector? https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/avc/sd-avc/2-1-0/ug/sd-avc-2-1-0-ug.pdf On Jul 2, 2019, at 17:18, Joe Yabuki <joeyabukiyin () gmail com> wrote: Hi all, How do you deal with QoS for Office365, since the IPs are subject to changes ? How can we mark the trafic while keeping the security (I fear the marking based on TCP/UDP Ports since they are not without an additional risk coming from worms/virus using those ports for example, and doing that directly on the PCs doesn't seem to be the best solution) ? Many thanks, Joe
Current thread:
- Re: QoS for Office365, (continued)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- RE: QoS for Office365 Steve Mikulasik via NANOG (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher (Jul 09)
- RE: QoS for Office365 Steve Mikulasik via NANOG (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Andrews (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Milhollan (Jul 10)