nanog mailing list archives
Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS
From: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:37:14 -0500
Next thing we know someone is going to start pumping up EIGRP. On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 1:34 PM Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
there's an old saying, is-is is deployed in few networks, just some of the world's largest ones. there might be a reason for that. personally, i prefer emacs. randy
Current thread:
- [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Steven Bahnsen (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Tom Beecher (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Tom Hill (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Saku Ytti (Jan 25)
- RE: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Aaron Gould (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Randy Bush (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Tom Beecher (Jan 25)