nanog mailing list archives
AT&T starting to charge for RFOs on ASE tail circuits?
From: Victor Breen <victor () impulse net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 19:35:23 +0000
Hey All, I just caught wind from multiple support reps of ours that AT&T is now demanding payment to get an RFO. As in, our folks are calling up AT&T to see why a particular tail circuit was down for whatever period of time and has since come back up with no clear utility power issue or backhoe fade to explain it. The response they get is that an RFO is billable and they have been asked to accept the charge to proceed (which they have rightly rejected thus far). This is the first time I've heard of this happening with any of our last-mile transport providers. I'm very curious, has anyone else experienced this lately with AT&T or any other carriers? -- Victor Breen | victor () impulse net Sr. Engineer | Impulse Advanced Communications www.impulse.net
Current thread:
- AT&T starting to charge for RFOs on ASE tail circuits? Victor Breen (Jan 18)
- Re: AT&T starting to charge for RFOs on ASE tail circuits? Kaiser, Erich (Jan 18)
- Re: AT&T starting to charge for RFOs on ASE tail circuits? Victor Breen (Jan 18)
- Re: AT&T starting to charge for RFOs on ASE tail circuits? Mel Beckman (Jan 18)
- Re: AT&T starting to charge for RFOs on ASE tail circuits? Victor Breen (Jan 18)
- Message not available
- RE: AT&T starting to charge for RFOs on ASE tail circuits? Tony Patti (Jan 18)
- Re: AT&T starting to charge for RFOs on ASE tail circuits? Kaiser, Erich (Jan 18)