nanog mailing list archives

Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers

From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:46:02 +0200



On 16/Jan/19 10:06, Job Snijders wrote:



I can see some use cases, but in today’s internet landscape the
practice just increases the attack surface, so it’s not the Best
Current Practise.


I would say...

Mark.

Current thread:

Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Andy Davidson (Jan 03)
- Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Mark Tinka (Jan 15)
  - Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Job Snijders (Jan 16)
    - Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Mark Tinka (Jan 16)
  - Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Christoffer Hansen (Jan 16)
    - Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Job Snijders (Jan 16)
    - Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Siyuan Miao (Jan 16)
    - Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Mark Tinka (Jan 16)
    - Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Job Snijders (Jan 16)
    - Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Amreesh Phokeer (Jan 16)
    - Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Matthias Waehlisch (Jan 16)
    - Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Randy Bush (Jan 16)
    - Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Job Snijders (Jan 16)
  - Re: Announcing Peering-LAN prefixes to customers Randy Bush (Jan 16)

(Thread continues...)