nanog mailing list archives

RE: BGP topological vs centralized route reflector

From: <adamv0025 () netconsultings com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:28:03 -0000

yes

 

From: Jason Lixfeld <jason+nanog () lixfeld ca> 
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 4:06 PM
To: adamv0025 () netconsultings com
Cc: Mohammad Khalil <eng.mssk () gmail com>; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: BGP topological vs centralized route reflector

 

Hi Adam,





On Feb 19, 2019, at 10:28 AM, <adamv0025 () netconsultings com <mailto:adamv0025 () netconsultings com> > <adamv0025 () 
netconsultings com <mailto:adamv0025 () netconsultings com> > wrote:

 

-Type-1 RDs will help you simulate full-mesh.  

 

By “Type-1 RD”, are you referring to a unique RD per PE?

Current thread:

Re: BGP topological vs centralized route reflector, (continued)
- - - Re: BGP topological vs centralized route reflector Mark Tinka (Feb 14)
    - MX204 applications, (was about BGP RR design) Saku Ytti (Feb 15)
    - Re: MX204 applications, (was about BGP RR design) Mark Tinka (Feb 15)
    - RE: MX204 applications, (was about BGP RR design) Phil Lavin (Feb 15)
    - Re: MX204 applications, (was about BGP RR design) Saku Ytti (Feb 15)
    - RE: MX204 applications, (was about BGP RR design) Phil Lavin (Feb 15)
    - Re: MX204 applications, (was about BGP RR design) Mark Tinka (Feb 15)
    - RE: MX204 applications, (was about BGP RR design) adamv0025 (Feb 19)
- RE: BGP topological vs centralized route reflector adamv0025 (Feb 19)
  - Re: BGP topological vs centralized route reflector Jason Lixfeld (Feb 19)
    - RE: BGP topological vs centralized route reflector adamv0025 (Feb 19)