nanog mailing list archives

Re: [proj-bgp] adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor?


From: "Montgomery, Douglas \(Fed\) via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:50:37 +0000

Our effort to get our new monitor transitioned to a public facing system ran into a wall for ~35 days.  Unfortunately 
during that time, the visa of a visiting researcher leading that effort expired.  

We have almost recovered from all of that.  Unfortunately, we have a bit of a bureaucracy to deploying public facing 
systems.  So I would guess it will take ~end of March to get it on-line.

Thanks
DougM
--
Doug Montgomery, Manager Internet  & Scalable Systems Research @ NIST
 

 
   Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:39:00 +0000
    From: nusenu <nusenu-lists () riseup net>
    To: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram () nist gov>
    Cc: rpki-monitor <rpki-monitor () nist gov>, "nanog () nanog org"
        <nanog () nanog org>, "Montgomery, Douglas (Fed)" <dougm () nist gov>
    Subject: Re: [proj-bgp] adding graphs for actually unreachable RPKI
        INVALID prefixes to RPKI Monitor?
    Message-ID: <2b8f9b07-27a7-08ba-ac51-afd39b30f769 () riseup net>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
    
    Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) (2018-09-18):> I also found your analysis very interesting and useful. Thanks for that.
    > 
    >> What do you think about adding graphs that show the amount of actually
    >> unreachable prefixes and IP space? (prefix where no alternative valid/unknown announcement exists)
    > 
    > I am also part of the NIST BGP team. 
    > Doug has already responded with information that we will soon have a new version of the NIST Monitor
    > which will provide the kind of graphs that you requested.
    
    Can you share an estimate for when you plan to publish the new version of the NIST Monitor?
    
    thanks,
    nusenu
 


Current thread: