nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP topological vs centralized route reflector


From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 20:00:33 +0200

Hey,

in-band, out-of-band is bit of misnomers to me. You mean in-path or out-of-path.


Main advantage of out-of-path is that you decouple FIB and RIB scaling
requirements and feature requirements. Your backbone device does not
need to be qualified for large RIB or BGP at all. And when you do need
more RIB scaling, you can upgrade out-of-path without any network
interruption.

Main advantage of in-path is maturity and simplicity, you don't need
ORR and you might not need AddPath.

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:37 PM Mohammad Khalil <eng.mssk () gmail com> wrote:

Dears
Am trying to find some documents and practical implementations regarding bgp topological vs centralized route 
reflector(In-band vs out-of-band)

Any good shares are appreciated



-- 
  ++ytti


Current thread: