nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers
From: Alex Band <alex () nlnetlabs nl>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:33:02 +0100
Congrats Jay, this is awesome news!
On 12 Feb 2019, at 01:01, Jay Borkenhagen <jayb () braeburn org> wrote: Compton, Rich A writes:That's great! Do you guys have plans to publish ROAs for your own netblocks? If so, can you please share info on your process (tools, pitfalls, etc.)? Thanks!Hi Rich, We do have ROAs published for a not insignificant fraction of our address space. For example (and cherry-picking the representation most favorable to us) we're listed at #6 in the "25 Autonomous Systems with the most Address Space VALID by RPKI" at this NIST RPKI tracker: https://rpki-monitor.antd.nist.gov/#rpki_adopters
I’m interested to hear what is preventing you from creating ROAs for all of your announcements.
We will publish more ROAs over time. Thusfar we have been utilizing ARIN's hosted model, but down the road ARIN's delegated model will be in our future. https://www.arin.net/resources/rpki/using_rpki.html
What are your main drivers for wanting to move to the delegated model? Cheers! -Alex
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers, (continued)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Job Snijders (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Matthew Walster (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Nick Hilliard (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Michael Hallgren (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Job Snijders (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Matthew Walster (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Owen DeLong (Feb 13)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Jay Borkenhagen (Feb 11)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Alex Band (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Jay Borkenhagen (Feb 14)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Jay Borkenhagen (Feb 11)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers John Sweeting (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Owen DeLong (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Job Snijders (Feb 12)