nanog mailing list archives
Re: The future of transport in the metro area
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu>
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 11:04:33 -0400
On Sat, 03 Aug 2019 12:58:01 +0200, Mark Tinka said:
On 3/Aug/19 03:14, Brandon Martin wrote:� I've inquired with a few metro operators in my area about something like this, albeit a few years ago, and I got a pretty hard "no way we'd ever do that" out of them presumably for the reasons above.We are seeing requests from as low as 600km, up to 1,600km, all the way to 7,000km.
I'm having a hard time seeing any of those distances as being "metro" as opposed to long-haul.. or did they change the definitions again while I wasn't paying attention?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Mark Tinka (Aug 02)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Mark Tinka (Aug 02)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Etienne-Victor Depasquale (Aug 02)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Mark Tinka (Aug 02)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Etienne-Victor Depasquale (Aug 02)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Mark Tinka (Aug 02)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Brandon Martin (Aug 02)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Mark Tinka (Aug 03)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Valdis Klētnieks (Aug 03)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Mark Tinka (Aug 03)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Brandon Martin (Aug 03)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Mark Tinka (Aug 04)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Etienne-Victor Depasquale (Aug 04)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Brandon Martin (Aug 04)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Etienne-Victor Depasquale (Aug 02)
- Re: The future of transport in the metro area Mark Tinka (Aug 02)