nanog mailing list archives
Re: SLA language about monitoring route leaks and inter-connection issues
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 22:04:38 +0300
Peace, On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 9:54 PM Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:
We do our own internal monitoring of our announcements for now.
Good for you and your customers! That is already a clear signal of an extraordinary service to your customers. Not to underestimate your effort which I respect, but the original question was about the SLA language for that. Do you have one, legally? Our general
reaction is to deactivate sites where this is seen and work to understand what happened.
This is not clear to me, may I ask you to elaborate? Deactivating a site sounds like a local action while hijacking or leak is commonly an issue affecting either all or a lot of sites. -- Töma
Current thread:
- SLA language about monitoring route leaks and inter-connection issues Sean Donelan (Aug 26)
- Re: SLA language about monitoring route leaks and inter-connection issues Töma Gavrichenkov (Aug 26)
- Re: SLA language about monitoring route leaks and inter-connection issues Jared Mauch (Aug 26)
- Re: SLA language about monitoring route leaks and inter-connection issues Töma Gavrichenkov (Aug 26)
- Re: SLA language about monitoring route leaks and inter-connection issues Jared Mauch (Aug 26)
- Re: SLA language about monitoring route leaks and inter-connection issues Töma Gavrichenkov (Aug 26)