Re: MAP-E

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

Ask the vendor to support RFC8585.

 

Also, you can do it with OpenWRT.

 

I think 464XLAT is a better option and both of them are supported by OpenWRT.

 

You can also use OpenSource (Jool) for the NAT64.

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 2/8/19 14:20, "NANOG en nombre de Baldur Norddahl" <nanog-bounces () nanog org en nombre de baldur.norddahl () gmail 
com> escribió:

 

Hello

 

Are there any known public deployments of MAP-E? What about CPE routers with support?

 

The pricing on IPv4 is now at USD 20/address so I am thinking we are forced to go the CGN route going forward. Of all 
the options, MAP-E appears to be the most elegant. Just add/remove some more headers on a packet and route it as 
normal. No need to invest in anything as our core routers can already do that. No worries about scale.

 

BUT - our current CPE has zero support. We are too small that they will make this feature just for us, so I need to 
convince them there is going to be a demand. Alternatively I need to find a different CPE vendor that has MAP-E 
support, but are there any?

 

What is holding MAP-E back?  In my view MAP-E could be the end game for IPv4. Customers get full IPv6 and enough of 
IPv4 to be somewhat compatible. The ISP networks are not forced to do a lot of processing such as CGN otherwise 
requires.

 

I read some posts from Japan where users are reporting a deployment of MAP-E. Anyone know about that?

 

Regards,

 

Baldur

 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be 
for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached 
files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to 
inform about this communication and delete it.