Re: MAP-E

[Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>]

Valdis Kletnieks wrote:

> > > -> Of course, everything has good and bad things, but with NAT444 you
> > > need to do the same,
> >
> > With static port range assignment, we don't have to.
>
> So you're going to say what ports the users are forced to use...

Like DHCP, yes. So?

> > Only users know what applications they are using.
>
> When you don't know what applications on what ports they are using.

You don't have to know, because its user's problem.

> > I'm not interested in poor IPv6.
>
> Well... if you have poor IPv6 support from your ISP, we can understand that.

You don't understand I was an active member of IPng WG trying to
prevent the WG make poor decisions. I was only partially successful.

                                                        Masataka Ohta