nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct
From: Nick Morrison <nick () nanocat net>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 22:31:06 +0200
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 18:09, Alfie Pates <alfie@fdx.services> wrote:
I feel this comes off as poking fun at trans people, women, and earnest attempts to combat what are actual problems in our industry, more than it pokes fun at the industry itself which is what a good April Fool should do - this feels more like laughing at "outsiders" more than laughing at ourselves. I think this is pretty tone-deaf, in my opinion.
Completely agree, Alfie. (And hi, nanog, I'm Nick. Do we do introduction rounds here?) Nick
Current thread:
- DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct Mark E. Jeftovic (Apr 01)
- Re: DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct nicolas (Apr 01)
- Re: DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct Alfie Pates (Apr 01)
- RE: DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct Phillip Carroll (Apr 04)
- Re: DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct Cynthia Revström (Apr 05)
- Re: DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct Scott Morizot (Apr 05)
- RE: DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct Phillip Carroll (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct Nick Morrison (Apr 05)
- Re: DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct Shawn Ritchie (Apr 05)