nanog mailing list archives
Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:07:53 -0700
On Apr 11, 2019, at 9:45 AM, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf () gmail com> wrote:On Apr 11, 2019, at 8:43 AM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote: I’m pretty sure that no matter how good your power management is, any cell phone’s battery will die long before its /64 can be scanned.And that might be the point of the scan - not to find the addresses in use, but to deplete the battery. That would have the effect of service denial.
Why bother scanning in that case vs. just repeatedly hammering the same address? Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers, (continued)
- Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers Amos Rosenboim (Apr 10)
- Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers Ross Tajvar (Apr 10)
- Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers Owen DeLong (Apr 11)
- Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers Tore Anderson (Apr 11)
- Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers Mark Milhollan (Apr 13)
- Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers Tore Anderson (Apr 13)
- Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 10)
- Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers Owen DeLong (Apr 11)
- Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers Fred Baker (Apr 11)
- Re: Gi Firewall for mobile subscribers Owen DeLong (Apr 11)