nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bell Canada IP transit - NID required?
From: Eric Dugas <edugas () unknowndevice ca>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 22:02:34 -0400
I've requested many times 1G/10G EI circuits without CPEs and even had Settlement based peering from AS577 delivered on an EVC on a CPE-less ENNI so they definitely be flexible. This was with Bell wholesale thought. If you deal with retail, your experience may vary... On Sat, Sep 8, 2018, 19:25 JASON BOTHE via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
All, Just curious if anyone uses Bell Canada for IP transit in a colo environment and whether or not you were able to obtain a traditional cross-connect without having Bell place a managed CPE device in your cage. I can’t seem to find anyone intelligent enough to tell my any different other than “it’s never been done before” and “we need remote testing capabilities.” J~
Current thread:
- Bell Canada IP transit - NID required? JASON BOTHE via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: Bell Canada IP transit - NID required? Eric Dugas (Sep 08)
- Re: Bell Canada IP transit - NID required? Jeff Bilyk (Sep 10)
- Re: Bell Canada IP transit - NID required? Clayton Zekelman (Sep 09)
- Re: Bell Canada IP transit - NID required? Alain Hebert (Sep 11)
- Re: Bell Canada IP transit - NID required? John Hurley (Sep 10)
- Re: Bell Canada IP transit - NID required? Eric Dugas (Sep 08)