Re: Deploying IPv6 XLAT64

[Matt Hoppes <mattlists () rivervalleyinternet net>]

Thanks... that is what I don't understand:  Why is NAT64 such a 
difficult concept to put into routers and firewalls?  We already do NAT 
with IPv4 just fine.

I feel like IPv6 adoption would be much faster if there was a transition 
mechanism other than dual stacking.

Think: Corporate offices.  Rather than renumbering everything inside, 
they just turn on NAT64 and now they can begin a slow and controlled 
transition.

On 9/26/18 2:19 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> You can use Jool for both 464XLAT and just NAT64.
>
> I've done a workshop on this at the LACNIC meeting this week. See slides 43 and next ones:
>
> http://www.lacnic.net/innovaportal/file/3139/1/ipv6-only_v11_16-9.pdf
>
> Saludos,
> Jordi
>   
>   
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> en nombre de Matt Hoppes <mattlists () rivervalleyinternet net>
> Fecha: miércoles, 26 de septiembre de 2018, 15:03
> Para: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog () nanog org>
> Asunto: Deploying IPv6 XLAT64
>
>      Looking at getting into IPv6 here ourselves... one of the big hold ups
>      has been the dual stacking.
>      
>      Can anyone recommend a quality, not ridiculously convoluted to setup,
>      XLAT64 translator that we could run in our network to take the IPv6 to
>      an IPv4 address when the remote server doesn't have 6 capability?
>      
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.consulintel.es
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be 
> for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, 
> distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any 
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached 
> files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to 
> inform about this communication and delete it.