nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service)
From: Jason Canady <jason () unlimitednet us>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:49:10 -0400
Yes. Our service didn't start out this way, but a few years ago they added that. At least my rep at the time quoted me out with the fee added into it. I believe IPv6 BGP is free.
On 10/17/18 11:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Has anyone else dealt with this mess? Even my Cogent rep admits it's unique to their business.Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373
Current thread:
- Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Josh Luthman (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Jason Canady (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) David Hubbard (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) valdis . kletnieks (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Jeff Waddell (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Brielle Bruns (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Josh Luthman (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) David Hubbard (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Anderson, Charles R (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Josh Luthman (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Ben Cannon (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) Josh Luthman (Oct 17)
- Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service) H I Baysal (Oct 19)