nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGP protocol
From: James Bensley <jwbensley () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:29:59 +0000
On 15 November 2018 01:51:28 GMT, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com> wrote:
Also not true that the management network is the last thing to boot. In contrary, everything else depends on that being ready first. And that would also be true if we used is-is.
It is when you out management in a VRF...
ons. 14. nov. 2018 14.55 skrev James Bensley <jwbensley () gmail com>:Several networks I've seen placemanagementin a VRF / L3 VPN, which means that by the time you have remote management access, everything else is already working, it's like the last thing to come up when there's been a problem
Cheers, James.
Current thread:
- Re: IGP protocol, (continued)
- Re: IGP protocol Job Snijders (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Brandon Martin (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Aled Morris via NANOG (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Tashi Phuntsho (Nov 14)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol James Bensley (Nov 14)
- Re: IGP protocol Baldur Norddahl (Nov 14)
- SV: IGP protocol Gustav Ulander (Nov 14)
- Re: IGP protocol James Bensley (Nov 15)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 18)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 18)
- Re: IGP protocol Alfie Pates (Nov 18)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 18)
- Re: IGP protocol Nick Hilliard (Nov 18)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 18)