nanog mailing list archives
Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 07:49:58 -0500 (CDT)
*shrugs* Me hurting the EU's feelings is rather low on the list of things I care about. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "K. Scott Helms" <kscotthelms () gmail com> To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 7:46:19 AM Subject: Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Sadly this isn't true. While I doubt the EU regulators are going to come head hunting for companies any time soon they do have mechanisms in place to sanction companies who don't do business in the EU and the scope is clearly intended to reach where ever the data of EU natural persons is being held. https://gdpr-info.eu/art-3-gdpr/ I asked one of the EU regulators at RSA how they intended to enforce GDPR violations on businesses that don't operate in their jurisdiction and without hesitation he told me they'd use civil courts to sue the offending companies. On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Mike Hammett < nanog () ics-il net > wrote: If you don't have operations in the EU, you can not so politely tell the EU to piss off. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Kaufman" < matthew () matthew at > To: "Fletcher Kittredge" < fkittred () gwi net > Cc: "NANOG list" < nanog () nanog org > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 8:07:15 PM Subject: Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:56 PM Fletcher Kittredge < fkittred () gwi net > wrote:
What about my right to not have this crap on NANOG?
What about the likely truth that if anyone from Europe mails the list, then every mail server operator with subscribers to the list must follow the GDPR Article 14 notification requirements, as the few exceptions appear to not apply (unless you’re just running an archive). Matthew
Current thread:
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news, (continued)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Matthew Kaufman (May 21)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news John Levine (May 22)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Don Gould (May 22)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Matt Harris (May 22)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Mark Andrews (May 22)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Florian Weimer (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Hank Nussbacher (May 22)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news bzs (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Mike Hammett (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news K. Scott Helms (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Mike Hammett (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news K. Scott Helms (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news John Levine (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Owen DeLong (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Anne P. Mitchell Esq. (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Stephen Satchell (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Daniel Brisson (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Anne P. Mitchell Esq. (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news K. Scott Helms (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Anne P. Mitchell Esq. (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Michel 'ic' Luczak (May 26)