nanog mailing list archives
Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 18:07:15 -0700
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:56 PM Fletcher Kittredge <fkittred () gwi net> wrote:
What about my right to not have this crap on NANOG?
What about the likely truth that if anyone from Europe mails the list, then every mail server operator with subscribers to the list must follow the GDPR Article 14 notification requirements, as the few exceptions appear to not apply (unless you’re just running an archive). Matthew
Current thread:
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news, (continued)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news bzs (May 16)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Niels Bakker (May 17)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news bzs (May 17)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Mike Hammett (May 17)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Niels Bakker (May 17)
- Whois vs GDPR, latest news Zbyněk Pospíchal (May 17)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Sander Steffann (May 17)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Zbyněk Pospíchal (May 17)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Fletcher Kittredge (May 21)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news valdis . kletnieks (May 21)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Matthew Kaufman (May 21)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Jason Hellenthal (May 21)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Matthew Kaufman (May 21)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news John Levine (May 22)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Don Gould (May 22)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Matt Harris (May 22)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Mark Andrews (May 22)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Florian Weimer (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Hank Nussbacher (May 22)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news bzs (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Mike Hammett (May 23)