nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 22:33:25 -0800
Sure… You have to maintain the tunnel or they may reassign/reallocate the address. Here’s the reality of that, however: 1. Unless you care about reaching the customer they reassigned it to from your network, you don’t care. 2. Using it for ULA in addition to the tunnel isn’t really prohibited by that. It’s a gray area, I’ll admit. 3. Sure, they can cancel the service at any time, but you get what you pay for. It saves you $100/year while it lasts. Owen
On Mar 2, 2018, at 1:30 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at> wrote: Section 3 of https://tunnelbroker.net/tos.php <https://tunnelbroker.net/tos.php> It isn't "free". It may be included with a service that is currently available for free, but they aren't providing free address space for an unlimited period. Matthew Kaufman On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:45 PM Owen DeLong <owen () delong com <mailto:owen () delong com>> wrote: Space from tunnel brokers is also free. OwenOn Mar 2, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at <mailto:matthew () matthew at>> wrote: Exactly what Matt Harris says here... ULA is free. Space obtained from ARIN is not. You want to discourage someone from doing the right thing, charge a lot for that. Matthew Kaufman On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 11:30 AM Matt Harris <matt () netfire net <mailto:matt () netfire net>> wrote: On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com <mailto:owen () delong com>> wrote:I doubt anyone is taking it away, pointless and useless as it is. OwenI'm not sure I'd say it's pointless and useless. It's free, which gives it at least some point/use case, versus IPv6 space obtained from an RIR where, at least in ARIN's case, you have fees associated with that. I'm lucky enough to have a /32 from ARIN for the networks I work on, so we're not stretched for space or worried about deploying ULA. For a small organization where even a /48 would be a luxury, and with no good native IPv6 carriers available locally (still plenty of places like that), deploying IPv6 on ULA space may be the stepping stone they need until other options become open to them.
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Nicholas Warren (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Matt Harris (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Matthew Kaufman (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Matt Harris (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Bryan Holloway (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Matt Harris (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Matthew Kaufman (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Matt Harris (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses John Osmon (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses daveb (Mar 04)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Joel Whitehouse (Mar 04)