Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

[Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>]

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 06:46:19AM -0800,
 Royce Williams <royce () techsolvency com> wrote 
 a message of 19 lines which said:

> Full survey - with owners of the largest bit-boundary-aligned blocks
> that contain them - here:
>
> https://gist.github.com/roycewilliams/6cb91ed94b88730321ca3076006229f1

Unlike what you say, 112.112.112.112 works (note for the
humour-impaired: there is a trick):

% dig @112.112.112.112  facebook.com

; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Debian <<>> @112.112.112.112 facebook.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 41543
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;facebook.com.          IN A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
facebook.com.           126 IN A 31.13.74.1

;; Query time: 218 msec
;; SERVER: 112.112.112.112#53(112.112.112.112)
;; WHEN: Fri Mar 30 16:54:12 CEST 2018
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 57