nanog mailing list archives

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?

From: Matt Hoppes <mattlists () rivervalleyinternet net>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 07:33:08 -0400

Why do we need this?

We already have 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4. 

And any reputable company or ISP should be running their own. 

What purpose would this serve?

Current thread:

Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?, (continued)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Bill Woodcock (Mar 28)
  - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Aftab Siddiqui (Mar 28)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jared Mauch (Mar 28)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? David Ulevitch (Mar 28)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Bill Woodcock (Mar 28)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Tony Finch (Mar 29)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Michael Crapse (Mar 28)
  - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? DaKnOb (Mar 28)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Matt Hoppes (Mar 29)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mike Hammett (Mar 29)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? DaKnOb (Mar 29)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Chip Marshall (Mar 29)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Doug Clements (Mar 29)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Izaac (Mar 29)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? John Kinsella (Mar 29)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Brian Kantor (Mar 29)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Chris Adams (Mar 29)
    - Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Brian Kantor (Mar 29)

(Thread continues...)