nanog mailing list archives
Re: hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22
From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 19:32:04 +0000
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 at 19:26, Ken Chase <math () sizone org> wrote:
A reason to de-aggregate down to /24s, to make hijacks more difficult/less effective?
Or perhaps something less costly for everyone: a reason for HE to implement prefix-based EBGP filters? At any given moment there appear to be roughly 5500 prefixes in HE’s customer cone for which no attestation can be found in any of IRR, RPKI or WHOIS. I find this deeply concerning. Kind regards, Job
Current thread:
- hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22 Jay Ford (Mar 20)
- Re: hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22 Alejandro Acosta (Mar 20)
- Re: hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22 Ken Chase (Mar 20)
- Re: hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22 Job Snijders (Mar 20)
- Re: hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22 João Butzke (Mar 20)
- Re: hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22 Ken Chase (Mar 20)
- Re: hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22 Alejandro Acosta (Mar 20)
- Re: hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22 Alejandro Acosta (Mar 20)
- Re: hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22 Sandra Murphy (Mar 20)
- Re: hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22 Tim Evens (Mar 20)
- Re: hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22 Sandra Murphy (Mar 20)
- Re: hijacking of 128.255.192.0/22 Jared Mauch (Mar 21)