nanog mailing list archives
Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco
From: Phil Lavin <phil.lavin () cloudcall com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 21:40:00 +0000
I concur. Never bought Cisco 100G from them but the quality of the Juniper optics and other ancillary fibre stuff is great.
On 5 Jun 2018, at 20:58, Mitcheltree, Harold B <pete () ots utsystem edu> wrote: FS.COM --Pete ________________________________ From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of Ryugo Kikuchi <ringostarr0706 () gmail com> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:48:16 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Hey all, Does anyone have a recommended model of 3rd party's "QSFP-100G-LR4-S" for Cisco ASR and Nexus? Cisco's original 100G SFP costs us an arm and a leg, so we want to try to use 3rd party 100g SFP. But we are not sure which manufacturer's SFP is reliable or has good performance. Does anyone have experience? Many thanks, Roy
Current thread:
- 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Ryugo Kikuchi (Jun 05)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Mitcheltree, Harold B (Jun 05)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Phil Lavin (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Tom Hill (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Andrey Khomyakov (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Shawn Ritchie (Jun 06)
- RE: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Michel Py (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Andrey Khomyakov (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Eric Litvin (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Ryugo Kikuchi (Jun 11)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Alex S. (Jun 07)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Mitcheltree, Harold B (Jun 05)