nanog mailing list archives

Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco


From: Phil Lavin <phil.lavin () cloudcall com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 21:40:00 +0000

I concur. Never bought Cisco 100G from them but the quality of the Juniper optics and other ancillary fibre stuff is 
great.


On 5 Jun 2018, at 20:58, Mitcheltree, Harold B <pete () ots utsystem edu> wrote:

FS.COM


--Pete

________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of Ryugo Kikuchi <ringostarr0706 () gmail com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:48:16 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco

Hey all,

Does anyone have a recommended model of 3rd party's "QSFP-100G-LR4-S" for
Cisco ASR and Nexus?

Cisco's original 100G SFP costs us an arm and a leg, so we want to try to
use 3rd party 100g SFP.
But we are not sure which manufacturer's SFP is reliable or has good
performance.

Does anyone have experience?

Many thanks,

Roy


Current thread: