nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 17:16:59 -0400
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 12:27:35 -0400, "Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG" said:
Because, Apple adds a 25 ms artifical penalty to ipv4 dns resolution. https://ma.ttias.be/apple-favours-ipv6-gives-ipv4-a-25ms-penalty/
Umm.. It's 3 year old news that Apple implemented Happy Eyeballs. And if you read, it continues on saying that both Firefox and Chrome use a 300ms timer rather than 25ms. The solution is, of course, to not build websites that need to hit 20 or 30 IPv4-only tracking and affiliate and ad sites. :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Randy Bush (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Ben Cannon (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mark Tinka (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mike Hammett (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mark Tinka (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Mike Hammett (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Matt Harris (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap lobna gouda (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG (Jun 23)
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap valdis . kletnieks (Jun 23)